Practice Areas

Labor & Employment
array(1) { [0]=> object(WP_Post)#1849 (24) { ["ID"]=> int(273) ["post_author"]=> string(1) "1" ["post_date"]=> string(19) "2014-10-06 21:45:54" ["post_date_gmt"]=> string(19) "2014-10-06 21:45:54" ["post_content"]=> string(0) "" ["post_title"]=> string(24) "Lizbeth ("Beth") V. West" ["post_excerpt"]=> string(0) "" ["post_status"]=> string(7) "publish" ["comment_status"]=> string(6) "closed" ["ping_status"]=> string(6) "closed" ["post_password"]=> string(0) "" ["post_name"]=> string(19) "lizbeth-beth-v-west" ["to_ping"]=> string(0) "" ["pinged"]=> string(0) "" ["post_modified"]=> string(19) "2018-09-11 23:12:11" ["post_modified_gmt"]=> string(19) "2018-09-11 23:12:11" ["post_content_filtered"]=> string(0) "" ["post_parent"]=> int(0) ["guid"]=> string(47) "" ["menu_order"]=> int(0) ["post_type"]=> string(9) "attorneys" ["post_mime_type"]=> string(0) "" ["comment_count"]=> string(1) "0" ["filter"]=> string(3) "raw" } }


Shareholder Lizbeth ("Beth") West Quoted in LXBN Article

June 2 2015

Shareholder, Lizbeth (“Beth”) West, and her recent blog post was quoted in the LXBN articleThe Supreme Court’s Abercrombie Decision: Unsurprising, a Little Unclear” which discussed the long-awaited U.S. Supreme Court ruling in EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch in which the high court finally answered the question regarding when an employer must accommodate the religious practices of an applicant under Title VII.