Welcome to the Weintraub Resources section. Here, you can find our Blogs, Videos, and Podcasts, in which Weintraub attorneys regularly provide insights and updates on legal developments. You can also find upcoming Weintraub Events, as well as firm and client News.


2024 Brings Expansion for Medicare-Payable Mental Health Providers

In connection with the federal Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, marriage & family therapists (“MFTs”) as well as licensed professional clinical counselors (“LPCCs”) are eligible to receive payment from the Medicare program for covered behavioral health services with dates of services commencing January 1, 2024.  This change was intended to help address healthcare practitioner shortages and expand access to behavioral health services for Medicare beneficiaries.

California Medi-Cal Enrollment Appeals: An Uphill Battle but an Essential Tool

In our practices, we are seeing an increasing number of denials or de facto denials of Medi-Cal provider enrollments. The consequences of a Medi-Cal enrollment denial can be quite serious. First, a provider may not receive reimbursement for services provided to Medi-Cal beneficiaries when it is not an enrolled provider. Second, it takes a long time to advance applications through the California Department of Health Care Services (“DHCS”) enrollment application review process (in some instances nine months or even longer), so re-filing can mean an extended period of no reimbursement. Third, a provider or other providers that are affiliated with the denied provider may have to disclose the denial, however innocuous, on enrollment applications in the Medicare and Medicaid programs forever. Failure to do so may itself cause additional denials in the future, so it is also important to keep track of the denial.

Themes from American Health Law Association’s 2023 Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment Issues

I am fresh back from Baltimore, Maryland, where I was on the faculty of AHLA’s annual Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment Issues. I have been on the faculty of this program for a dozen years, and am always thrilled to hear the latest in healthcare payment and reimbursement changes and trends. This year I spoke on Medicare policies on hospital co-location, and presented along with the person who oversaw development of the government policy, David Wright, Director of the Quality, Safety & Oversight Group of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

Proposed Medicare and Medicaid Enrollment Rule for Skilled Nursing Facilities Implements Law Expanding Regulation of Private Equity Investments in Healthcare, Foreshadowing a Likely Trend

On February 13, 2023, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) proposed a long-delayed regulation that would implement a provider enrollment provision of the Affordable Care Act that expands the information required to be disclosed by skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”). The law requires that SNFs report detailed information to CMS regarding SNF relationships with private equity companies, real estate investment trusts and other real estate lessors, clinical consultants and providers of accounting and financial services during the provider enrollment process. The proposed rule was published in the Federal Register on February 15, 20231. The proposed changes are subject to comment; comments must be received by CMS by April 14, 2023. To become final, CMS would respond to these comments and issue a final rule thereafter.

California Healthcare Transactions to Undergo Additional Advance Regulatory Scrutiny as New Office of Health Care Affordability Scrutinizes Cost and Market Impact of Transaction

Certain healthcare transactions closing on or after April 1, 2024 are subject to an advance notice regulatory review and analysis by a newly created Office of Health Care Affordability (“OHCA”) within the California Department of Health Care Access and Information.  The OHCA will prospectively analyze the transactions by conducting a cost and market review of significant transactions and report to the public on the anticipated impacts on the healthcare market.  The information submitted to the OHCA by the parties to the transaction will become public information.

Use of Non-Physician Healthcare Practitioners Expanding in California

I have been in healthcare legal practice since the mid-1990s.  During a summer in law school, I worked for the California Legislative Counsel Bureau, which is the agency that serves as legal counsel to the California legislature.  During my stint there, I recall various healthcare licentiates arguing about whether to expand the practice of non-physicians, with physicians generally asserting that such changes would be detrimental to healthcare quality and the other healthcare licentiates arguing that they provide a quality service at a more reasonable price-point.  This same tension has woven its way through legislative and payment policy during the intervening decades with the same arguments being advanced.  However, during that time we have seen the gradual increase in scope of practice of non-physician advanced practice professionals such as nurse practitioners (“NPs”), physician assistants (“PA”) and certified nurse midwives.  These trends are evidenced by several recent legal developments both in Medicare payment policy and California state law.

Revenue Cycle Impact On Healthcare M&A Transactions: Medicare Provider Agreement Assumption Choices Can Drive Transaction Structure

The past year in healthcare transactions has been one of the more interesting of my career, with the complete shutdown of certain industry segments for a period due to the COVID-19 public health emergency, modified business climate and reopenings, government stimulus payments through the CARES Act, Payroll Protection Program and Accelerated Payment Programs, ongoing tax changes (including potential for higher capital gain tax rates), high enterprise valuations and low borrowing costs. We view 2021 as an active market for acquisitions, including in healthcare. We note that increasingly we are seeing buying side activity from venture capital or private equity funds, where pro forma post-closing cash flow considerations are critical drivers of decisions.

A Summary Of Cares Act Provider Relief Efforts

As part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), the federal government allocated $175 billion in payments to be distributed to health care providers through the Provider Relief Fund (PRF) for expenses related to health care or lost revenue due to COVID-19. These distributions are grants, not loans, and do not need to be repaid so long as recipient providers comply with the applicable terms and conditions.

Read full publication on AHLA website.

Cares Act Provider Relief Funds: Reporting Set To Begin In 2021; New Reporting Requirements

The Health Resources and Services Administration (“HRSA”) has completed review of Phase 3 applications for the CARES Act Provider Relief Fund (“PRF”) and expects to distribute $24.5 billion to over 70,000 health care providers by the end of this month. These payments are intended to cover loss revenues attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic. According to HRSA, over 35,000 Phase 3 applicants will not receive any additional payment because they either experienced no change in revenues or net expenses attributable to COVID-19, or those that have already received funds that equal or exceed reimbursement of 88% of reported losses.1