^ WP_User {#14041
  +data: {#14042
    +"ID": "6"
    +"user_login": "Msiceloff"
    +"user_pass": "$P$BVg0DDH.AOcuasVwoTguJCoGHjNlJt1"
    +"user_nicename": "msiceloff"
    +"user_email": "msiceloff@weintraub.com"
    +"user_url": ""
    +"user_registered": "2022-06-21 15:33:28"
    +"user_activation_key": ""
    +"user_status": "0"
    +"display_name": "Mary Siceloff"
  }
  +ID: 6
  +caps: array:1 [
    "administrator" => true
  ]
  +cap_key: "wp_capabilities"
  +roles: array:1 [
    0 => "administrator"
  ]
  +allcaps: array:69 [
    "switch_themes" => true
    "edit_themes" => true
    "activate_plugins" => true
    "edit_plugins" => true
    "edit_users" => true
    "edit_files" => true
    "manage_options" => true
    "moderate_comments" => true
    "manage_categories" => true
    "manage_links" => true
    "upload_files" => true
    "import" => true
    "unfiltered_html" => true
    "edit_posts" => true
    "edit_others_posts" => true
    "edit_published_posts" => true
    "publish_posts" => true
    "edit_pages" => true
    "read" => true
    "level_10" => true
    "level_9" => true
    "level_8" => true
    "level_7" => true
    "level_6" => true
    "level_5" => true
    "level_4" => true
    "level_3" => true
    "level_2" => true
    "level_1" => true
    "level_0" => true
    "edit_others_pages" => true
    "edit_published_pages" => true
    "publish_pages" => true
    "delete_pages" => true
    "delete_others_pages" => true
    "delete_published_pages" => true
    "delete_posts" => true
    "delete_others_posts" => true
    "delete_published_posts" => true
    "delete_private_posts" => true
    "edit_private_posts" => true
    "read_private_posts" => true
    "delete_private_pages" => true
    "edit_private_pages" => true
    "read_private_pages" => true
    "delete_users" => true
    "create_users" => true
    "unfiltered_upload" => true
    "edit_dashboard" => true
    "update_plugins" => true
    "delete_plugins" => true
    "install_plugins" => true
    "update_themes" => true
    "install_themes" => true
    "update_core" => true
    "list_users" => true
    "remove_users" => true
    "promote_users" => true
    "edit_theme_options" => true
    "delete_themes" => true
    "export" => true
    "wf2fa_activate_2fa_self" => true
    "wf2fa_activate_2fa_others" => true
    "wf2fa_manage_settings" => true
    "copy_posts" => true
    "wpseo_manage_options" => true
    "manage_postman_smtp" => true
    "manage_postman_logs" => true
    "administrator" => true
  ]
  +filter: null
  -site_id: 1
}
Mary Siceloff, Author at Weintraub Tobin - Page 48 of 179

Welcome to the Weintraub Tobin Resources Page

Browse below for news, legal insights, information on presentations and events, and other resources from the Weintraub Tobin legal team.


4th UPDATE: DOL Again Updates Question & Answers Page for FFCRA

We have previously written about the US Department of Labor issuing a Question & Answers webpage, and subsequently updated it, to address numerous issues arising out of the passage of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”). (Click here, here and here.) On April 6, 2020, the DOL again updated the “Questions and Answers” webpage, adding 9 new questions and answers (##80-88) that largely clarify prior guidance from the Department. Here is a summary of the issues addressed by the DOL’s fourth update to the Q&A page:

For Employers:

  • Clarifying the manner for calculating the number of hours of paid sick leave and expanded family and medical leave due an employee who works irregular hours. (##80-81)
  • Providing a detailed explanation as to how to compute an employee’s average rate of pay for purposes of FFCRA, including those employees on a fixed salary each workweek. (##82-83)
  • Allowing employers to use rounding when computing the number of hours of sick leave due provided that employers do so consistently among all employees and in accordance with typical time increments (i.e. if employer general uses quarter-hour increments, employer may use quarter-hour increments for purposes of rounding here). (#84).
  • Stating that an employer must only use one six-month period of time (calculated from when the employee first takes FFCRA leave) for determining the regular rate of pay rather than doing a six-month calculation each time an employee takes FFCRA leave if it is intermittent. (#85)
  • Explaining the interplay between paid sick leave under the FFCRA with employer-provided leave plans, specifically whether an employer can require an employee to take employer-provided leave before taking FFCRA leave. (#86)

For Employees:

  • Clarifies that a “shelter in place” or “stay home” order from a federal, state or local agencies qualifies as a quarantine or isolation order for purposes of FFCRA leave, provided the employer has work for the employee and the “shelter in place” or “stay home” order prevents the employee from performing the work, either in person or via telework. (#87)
  • Explains that an employee is entitled to the full amount of unpaid leave due to them under the FFCRA, instead of just the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour, if the Department is required to bring an enforcement action on their behalf against their employer for violating the FFCRA. (#88)

California employers should continue to monitor our blog for future updates concerning the FFCRA and other employment developments as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. We also advise employers to seek legal advice to determine whether the FFCRA applies to their business, and if so, what steps to take to ensure compliance.

Burbank High School Jumps with Glee over Copyright Victory

Burbank High School runs a music program that reportedly provided the inspiration for the hit TV show, Glee. It is nationally known for the competitive show choirs its students participate in as part of the program. To defray the costs of fielding several choirs, a non-profit booster club was formed to help fundraise for the music education program. The booster club puts on a couple of annual fundraising shows, Burbank Blast and Pop, which include both the Burbank High School choirs as well as a number of other competitive choirs. The choirs’ music director serves as the liaison between the school’s choirs and the booster club.

The music director hired an arranger to create custom sheet music for two shows to be performed at the fundraisers: Rainmaker and 80’s Movie Montage. In creating these performances, the arranger used snippets from the following songs: Magic (originally performed by Olivia Newton John) and (I’ve Had the) Time of My Life (by Bill Medley and Jennifer Warnes) as well as Hotel California and Don’t Phunk with my Heart. After several performances, Tresona Multimedia, LLC, sued the music director, the booster club and parent-members of the booster club for copyright infringement. Tresona Multimedia alleged that it owned the copyrights to the above songs and that its copyright interests were infringed upon because no licenses were obtained to allow the use of the above songs in the performances.

Weintraub Attorney Jo Dale Carothers Named to San Diego Super Lawyers® 2020 List

SAN DIEGO, CA (April 10, 2020) – Weintraub Tobin, a leading California full-service law firm, is pleased to announce that Jo Dale Carothers, Ph.D.  is a 2020 San Diego Super Lawyers honoree.

Jo Dale Carothers is a shareholder and chair of the firm’s Intellectual Property Group. Her practice emphasizes intellectual property litigation, licensing, contract disputes, and issues related to proceeding before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (UPSPTO) in all fields. She has represented companies in litigation in numerous federal district courts and state courts across the country, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, and in Section 337 investigations in the United States international Trade Commission (ITC). Jo Dale is an in-demand speaker and panelist on IP topics and a frequent contributor to the Intellectual Property Law Blog.

Super Lawyers recognizes outstanding attorneys who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement in more than 70 practice areas. Each year, no more than five percent of the lawyers in the state are selected by the research team at Super Lawyers to receive this honor.  The annual selections are made using a patented multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, an independent research evaluation of candidates, and peer reviews by practice area.

Coronavirus-Related Tax Relief for the Real Estate and Agricultural Industries

Through various mechanisms, the federal government has issued several forms of tax relief to real estate and agricultural businesses impacted by the current COVID-19 pandemic. The majority of the tax relief was included in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). However, the Internal Revenue Service has also issued guidance providing additional relief. This discussion is intended to serve as a high-level summary for professionals in the real estate and agricultural industries seeking tax relief.

Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Deadlines Extended Due to COVID-19

On March 31, 2020, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office announced that, pursuant to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, certain deadlines for patent and trademark applications would be extended.  The CARES Act authorizes the PTO to toll, waive, or modify any patent or trademark deadline in effect during the COVID-19 emergency.  The announcements were made in written Notices of Waiver, one each for patents and trademarks, posted on the PTO’s website.

In order to exercise the power under the CARES Act, the PTO Director must determine that the COVID-19 pandemic materially affects the functioning of the PTO; prejudices the rights of patent applicants, trademark registrants, or patent/trademark owners; or prevents patent applicants, trademark registrants, or patent/trademark owners from making a filing or paying a fee in the PTO.

The President declared a national emergency on March 13, 2020.  The PTO Director has determined that the emergency has prejudiced the rights of applicants, registrants, and owners, and has prevented applicants,  registrants, and owners from making filings and paying fees in the PTO.  The Director has found that “the spread of the virus has significantly disrupted the operations of numerous businesses, law firms, and inventors.”  The Director specifically noted that small businesses and independent inventors are especially likely to face difficulties.

The Director has extended for 30 days certain patent deadlines that were due between March 27, 2020 and April 30, 2020.  The deadlines include the due dates for replying to a PTO notice or office action; paying a patent issue fee or maintenance fee; filing a trademark statement of use or affidavit of use; filing a notice of opposition; and filing a notice of appeal, appeal brief, or reply brief.

In order to obtain an extension under these provisions, the applicant/registrant/owner must file a statement that the delay was due to the COVID-19 pandemic.  The statement may properly be submitted if the applicant/registrant/owner, attorney, or other person associated with the filing was personally affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, such as because of office closure, inaccessibility of documents, cash flow problems, or illness.

Applicants/registrants/owners may also request that the PTO, PTAB, or TTAB grant extensions of other deadlines that are not covered in the Notices of Waiver.

At this time, the PTO’s offices are closed to the public, but are open for the filing of documents and payment of fees, and the examiners are continuing to work.  Filings and fee payments maybe made as usual, by the PTO’s electronic filing system, U.S. mail, fax, or hand delivery.   However, the Director has noted that these practices could change.

The U.S. Copyright Office has also similarly extended deadlines under the same authority.

It is possible that the PTO may further extend deadlines beyond May 30.  Any further extensions are expected to be announced on the PTO website.

3rd UPDATE: DOL Again Updates Questions & Answers Page for FFCRA

As previously advised, the US Department of Labor has issued a Question & Answers webpage, and subsequently updated it, to address numerous issues arising out of the passage of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”. (Click here and here.) The DOL updated the “Questions and Answers” webpage again today, adding 20 new questions and answers (##60-79). These updated Questions and Answers primarily address issues for employees regarding FFCRA leave but include some questions directed towards employers such as computing leave pay for seasonal workers with irregular schedules, employee counts for staffing agencies and the DOL 30-day stay of enforcement actions for FFCRA violations.

DOL’s Informational Webinar re FFCRA Compliance Goes Live

Earlier this week, the U.S. Department of Labor announced that it would be posting an informational webinar regarding compliance issues with the recently-enacted Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”). That webinar, which provides information regarding the FFCRA for both employers and employees went live today and can be accessed at:  https://dolwhd.cosocloud.com/pawkgwfawza0/?proto=true. The DOL’s Wage & Hour Division also distributed Power Point slides to accompany the webinar, which can be accessed here.

California employers should continue to monitor our blog for future updates concerning the FFCRA and other employment developments as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. We also remind employers that they should seek legal advice to determine whether the FFCRA applies to their business, and if so, what steps to take to ensure compliance.

Federal Circuit: Sequenom’s Fetal DNA Claims Are Patent Eligible

An unborn baby’s DNA (“fetal DNA”) can be used to determine the sex of the baby as well as to test for conditions such as Down’s syndrome.  In the past, procedures to get samples of fetal DNA for testing involved sticking a large needle through the abdominal wall and into the uterus of the mother to obtain amniotic fluid, but such procedures are invasive and can be life threatening in some cases.  Sequenom Inc. devised and patented less invasive options and licensed them to Illumina, Inc.  Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. and others, however, challenged the patent eligibility of those options when accused of patent infringement.

Specifically, the various lawsuits have repeatedly brought into question whether the patent claims for these new prenatal tests and related methods are patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. §101 or if they are merely directed to ineligible natural phenomena.  In fact, in 2015, the Federal Circuit found Sequenom and Illumina’s patents (the “Original Patents”) were invalid as unpatentable because they were directed to a natural phenomenon.  This ruling raised many concerns in the industry as to which, if any, inventions of this type could be protected.The Original Patents covered an extremely useful medical test for pregnant mothers and their unborn babies.  Researchers determined that several types of DNA are floating around in the plasma of a pregnant mother.  While more than 90% of the DNA is the mother’s DNA (“maternal DNA”), other DNA such as bacterial DNA, and most importantly here, fetal DNA is also present in the mother’s plasma.  The fetal DNA is identifiable based on the fact that it contains DNA from both the mother and the father (“paternal DNA”).  Therefore, using a sample of paternal DNA, the researchers were able to locate fetal DNA in a mother’s plasma by looking for segments of DNA that match the paternal DNA.  By using fetal DNA from the mother’s plasma, the researchers determined they could eliminate the need for more invasive, and in some cases life threatening, test procedures.  However, in 2015 the Federal Circuit determined the Original Patents covering this new testing approach were patent ineligible because the claimed subject matter was directed to a natural phenomenon.

The IRS FAQs Provide Guidance on Employee Documentation/Information to Support FFCRA Leave

n March 31, 2020, the IRS issued 66 FAQs providing guidance to employers in connection with the payment of, and tax credits for, emergency paid sick leave (E-PSL) and emergency FMLA leave (E-FMLA) under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”).  Among other things, the FAQs answered a very important question that the DOL didn’t (instead, in its FAQ 15, the DOL essentially deferred to the IRS).  The important question is: what documentation or information can employers require employees to submit to support their request for E-PSL or E-FMLA?

IRS FAQ No. 44 states expressly:

  1. What information should an Eligible Employer receive from an employee and maintain to substantiate eligibility for the sick leave or family leave credits?

An Eligible Employer will substantiate eligibility for the sick leave or family leave credits if the employer receives a written request for such leave from the employee in which the employee provides:

  1. The employee’s name;
  2. The date or dates for which leave is requested;
  3. A statement of the COVID-19 related reason the employee is requesting leave and written support for such reason; and
  4. A statement that the employee is unable to work, including by means of telework, for such reason.

In the case of a leave request based on a quarantine order or self-quarantine advice, the statement from the employee should include the name of the governmental entity ordering quarantine or the name of the health care professional advising self-quarantine, and, if the person subject to quarantine or advised to self-quarantine is not the employee, that person’s name and relation to the employee.

In the case of a leave request based on a school closing or child care provider unavailability, the statement from the employee should include the name and age of the child (or children) to be cared for, the name of the school that has closed or place of care that is unavailable, and a representation that no other person will be providing care for the child during the period for which the employee is receiving family medical leave and, with respect to the employee’s inability to work or telework because of a need to provide care for a child older than fourteen during daylight hours, a statement that special circumstances exist requiring the employee to provide care.

The IRS FAQs provide other useful information about determining the amount of the tax credit for qualified sick leave wages; determining the amount of allocable qualified health plan expenses; how to claim the credits; periods of time for which credits are available; and more.  You can read the full IRS FAQs here.

The Labor and Employment attorneys as Weintraub Tobin continue to wish you and your families good health during these difficult times.  Please reach out to any of us if we can assist you with your employment law needs.